Strategi Pengelolaan Generasi Y di Industri Perbankan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2014.13.2.7Abstract
Abstrak. Prinsip tata kelola perusahaan (good corporate governance/GCG) menjadi salah satu pilar yang disyaratkan oleh Bank Indonesia dalam arsitektur perbankan Indonesia. Pada pendekatan ini, titik beratnya adalah pada upaya peningkatan kapabilitas Bankir. Permasalahan baru muncul dengan masuknya Generasi Y sebagai sebuah angkatan kerja baru. Kajian pustaka memerkenalkan generasi ini sebagai generasi yang memiliki tingkat pendidikan yang paling tinggi serta memiliki potensi yang besar namun generasi ini meminta perlakuan khusus. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami keberadaan Generasi Y sebagai sebuah angkatan kerja baru dalam industri Perbankan dan menghasilkan sebuah strategi yang dapat digunakan oleh divisi sumber daya manusia dalam mengelola generasi ini. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan diskusi kelompok terarah (focus group discussion/FGD) untuk memahami generasi ini. Tema yang dihasilkan dalam FGD dikonfirmasikan dengan metode confirmatory factor analysis. Survei pakar dengan metode proses jaringan analisis (analytical network process/ANP) dilakukan untuk mengetahui prioritas faktor Generasi Y dan prioritas strategi dengan pendekatan analisa benefit, opportunity, cost dan risk (BOCR). Hasil studi memberikan inferensi pentingnya faktor inherent Generasi Y dan perlunya pelibatan pihak eksternal dalam pengelolaan Generasi Y. Rekomendasi lain yang dihasilkan adalah pentingnya sikap proaktif dari Perbankan untuk mendekati Generasi Y sedini mungkin untuk memastikan ketertarikan generasi ini pada industri Perbankan.
Kata kunci: generasi y, kepemimpinan, pengelolaan, perbankan, strategi
Abstract. Good corporate governance (GCG) as mandated in Bank Indonesias's banking architecture, highlighting the importance of human resource to serve as catalyst to achieve business goals. New challenge arises by the coming of Generation Y into the workforce. Literature described this generation as the most educated and potential yet at the same time highlighting the need to address specific concern and preferences as hygiene factors for this generation. The research aims to dissect and portrays this phenomena and further presenting strategy to manage this Generation. Focus group discussion (FGD) use to deepen the understanding of the generation and further confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Expert survey conducted and related-factors are prioritized using analytical network process (ANP) by incorporating the benefit, opportunity, cost and risk (BOCR) analysis. The result of the study highlighting the importance of Gen Y factor and external involvement in developing engagement strategies. The research also presents the importance of bank to start early engagement by building employer branding approach to enact and attract Gen Y into industry.
Keywords: banking, generation y, leadership, managing, strategy,
Downloads
References
Anantatmula, V.S., & Shrivastav, B. (2012). Evolution of Project Teams for Generation Y Workforce. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 51, 9-26. doi:10.1108/17538371211192874.
Budiman, A. (2008). Efek Status Merek terhadap Sikap Merek dan Kesediaan Membayar Harga Premium pada Generasi Y di Indonesia. National Conference on Management Research. Indonesia (ID). ISBN: 979-442-242-8.
Braunstein, J.R., & Zhang, J.J. (2005). Dimensions of Athletic Star Power Associated with Generation Y Sports Consumption. International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship. 6(4), 242-68.
Cheng, K. (2001). Setting their sites on Generation 'Y'. 9(31):46. Australia (AU): MediaWeek.
Christis, J. (2005). Theory and Practice of Soft Systems Methodology: a Performative Contradiction?.System Research and Behavioral Science. 22(1), 11-26.
Cui, Y., Trent, E.S., Sullivan, P.M., & Matiru, G.N. (2003). Cause-Related Marketing: How Generation Y Responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(6), 310-20.
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organization Fields. American Sociological Review. 48(2).
Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring Four Generations' Beliefs about Career: is 'satisfied' the New 'successful'?'. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 907-28.
Dulin, L. (2005). Leadership Preferences of A Generation Y Cohort: A Mixed Methods Investigation [disertasi]. Arlington (US): University of North Texas.
Erickson, T. (2008). Plugged In: The Generation Y Guide to Thriving at Work. Amerika Serikat (US): Harvard Business Pres.
Espinoza, C., Ukleja, M., & Rusch, C. (2010). Managing the Millennials: Discover the Core Competencies for Managing Today's Workforce. New Jersey (US): John Wiley & Sons.
Fiedler, F. E. (1996). Research on Leadership Selection and Training: One View of the Future. Administrative Science Quarterly, 241-250.
Greene, E. (2003). Connecting with Generation Y, Chronicle of Philanthropy, 15(19), 31-3.
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (1991). Generations: The History of America's Future, 1584 to 2069. New York (US): William Morrow & Company.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton. (US):Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton (US) Princeton University Press.
Keenan, A., Newton, T. (1984). Frustrations in organizations: relationships to role stress, climate and psychological strain. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57(1), 57-66.
Kusnendi. (2008). Model-Model Persamaan Struktural: Satu dan Multi group Sample dengan Lisrel. Bandung (ID):Alfabeta.
Kirkman, B.L., Lowe, K.B., & Gibson, C.B. (2006). A Quarter Century of Culture'sConsequences: a Review of Empirical Research Incorporating Hofstede's Cultural Values Framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 285-320.
Lancaster, L.C., & Stillman, D. (2002). When Generations Collide: Who They Are. Why They Clash. How to Solve the Generational Puzzle at Work. New York (US):Harper Collins Publishers.
Lowe, G.S., & Schellenberg, G. (2002). Employees' Basic Value Proposition: Strong HR Strategies Must Address Work Values. Canadian HR Reporter. 15, 18-23.
Lindquist, T.M. (2008). Recruiting The Millennium Generation: The New CPA. The CPA Journal 78(8), 56-9.
Luscombe, J., Lewis, I., & Biggs, H.C. (2013). Essential Elements for Recruitment and Retention: Generation Y. Education & Training. 553, 272-290.doi:10.1108 /00400911311309323.
Malhotra, N.K. (2010). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation. Ed ke-6. New Jersey (US): Pearson.
Martin, C.A., & Bush, A.J. (2000). Do Role Models Influence Teenagers' Purchase Intentions and Behavior?. Journal of Consumer Marketing 17(5), 441-54.
Nohria, N., Rakesh, K. (2010). Handbook of Leadership Theory and Practice. Amerika Serikat (US): Harvard Business Press.
[PWCLLP] Price Water house Coopers LLP. (2008). Managing Tomorrow's People, The Future of Work to 2020. London (GB): PWC LLP.
Rogler, L.H. (2002). Historical Generations and Psychology: The case of the Great Depression and World War II. The American Psychologist. 57(December), 1013-1023.
Rothwell, W. (2001). Effective Succession Planning. Ed ke-2. New York (US): AAAMACOM.
Rugimbana, R. (2007). Generation Y: How cultural values can be used to predict their choice of electronic financial services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing.114(1),301-313. doi:10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4760048.
Saaty, T.L. (1999). Fundamentals of the Analytic Network Process. Amerika Serikat (US): University of Pittsburgh.
Sessa, V.I., Kabacoff, R.I., Deal, J., & Brown, H. (2007). Generation Differences in Leader Values and Leadership Behaviors. The Psychologist-Manager Journal,10(1), 47-74.
Smelser, N.J. (2001). Mannheim Karl. 1893-1947. New York (US): Elsevier.Stevens, J.A., Lathrop, A.H., & Bradish, C.L. (2003). Who is Your Hero? Implications for Athlete Endorsement Strategies''. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 12(2), 103.
Sujansky, J.G., & Ferri, R.J. (2009). Keeping the Millennials: Why Companies are Losing Billions in Turnover to This Generation and What To Do About It. New York (US): John Wiley & Sons.
Tulgan, B. (2009). Not Everyone Gets A Trophy: How to Manage Generation Y. San Francisco (US): Jossey-Bass.
Tulgan, B., & Martin, C. (2001). Managing Generation Y: Global Citizens Born in the Late Seventies and Early Eighties. Canada (US): HRD Press.
Walburg, J.M., & Pokrywczynski, J. (2001). A Psychographic Analysis of Generation Y College Students. Journal of Advertising Research, 41(5), 33-52.
Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in Organizations. Ed ke-7. New Jersey (US): Pearson.
Zopiatis, A., Krambia-Kapardis, M., & Varnavas, A. (2012). Y-ers, X-ers and Boomers: Investigating the Multigenerational Misperceptions in the Hospitality Workplace. Tourism and Hospitality Research. 122, 101-121.doi:10.1177/ 1467358412466668.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright @2023. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium.
