Pengujian Pecking Order Theory terhadap Perusahaan Surplus Non Keuangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2017.16.2.6Keywords:
Capital structure, pecking order theory, financing decision, surplus, debtAbstract
Abstrak. Pentingnya mengetahui apakah sebuah perusahaan menguntungkan, dapat dilihat dengan mengetahui apakah perusahaan tersebut mengalami surplus atau sebaliknya. Penelitian terhadap perusahaan, dalam kondisi surplus masih jarang, dikarenakan hampir mayoritas penelitian dalam pecking order theory di Indonesia hanya terfokus pada satu atau beberapa sektor saja. Diantara beberapa struktur modal, yang dipilih adalah pecking order theory, dikarenakan teori ini merupakan teori yang dinamis sesuai dengan pasar yang tidak sempurna dibandingkan dengan teori struktur modal lainnya. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di BEI mengikuti pecking order theory, apakah perusahaan surplus mengikuti pecking order theory dan apakah perusahaan surplus menggunakan surplus yang dmiliki untuk membayar hutang perusahaan. Metode penelitian menggunakan software E-views 9, dimana pemilihan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Temuan dari penelitian yaitu perusahaan non keuangan di indonesia tidak mengikuti pecking order theory, perusahaan surplus tidak mengikuti pecking order theory untuk membayar utang terlebih dahulu dan perusahaan surplus tidak membayar utang menggunakan surplus yang dimiliki.
Kata Kunci: Struktur modal, pecking order theory, keputusan pendanaan, surplus, utang
Abstract. The importance of knowing that a firm is profitable, can be seen whether the company surplus or the otherwise. The study related to pecking order theory for surplus firm is still rare, since almost the majority of research in pecking order theory in Indonesia is focused only on one or more sectors. Among the several capital structures, the chosen is pecking order theory, because this theory is a dynamic theory in accordance with the market which is not perfect compared with other capital structure theory. The purpose of this study is to find out whether the non-financial companies listed on the BEI follow the pecking order theory, whether the surplus companies follow the pecking order theory and whether the surplus companies use the surplus that has to pay the company's debt. The research method using E-views 9 software, where the sample selection using purposive sampling method. The findings from the research of non-financial companies in Indonesia do not follow pecking order theory, surplus companies do not follow pecking order theory to pay the debt in advance and surplus companies do not pay debts using surplus owned.
Keywords: Capital structure, pecking order theory, financing decision, surplus, debt
Downloads
References
Abor, J., & Biekpe, N. (2007). How do we explain the capital structure of SMEs in sub-Saharan Africa?. Journal Economic Study, 36(1), 83-97.
Adedeji. A. (2002). A Cross-sectional test of pecking order hypothesis against static trade-off theory on UK data. SSRN Working Paper Series.
Baeva, E.A. (2010), New approaches to the development and use of the sinking fund as a source of own resources of the organization in terms of innovative development of economy. Socio-Economic Phenomena and Processes, 6(022), 26-32.
Bhama V., Jain Kumar P., & Yadav Surendra S. (2016). Testing the pecking order theory of deficit and surplus firms: Indian evidence. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12(3), 335-350.
Chen, X. (2012). Strong law of large numbers under an upper probability. Applied Mathematics, 3, 2056-2062.
Fabozzi F., & B. C. Peterson. (2000). Financing constraints and inventory investment: a comparative study with high-frequency panel data. Review of Economics and Statistic, 80: 513-519.
Dutta, A. (2013). Lemon problem and pecking order theory: an investigation on Indian corporate sector. Vilakshan, XIMB Journal, 10 (2), 73-82.
Fama, E., & French, K. (2002). Testing Trade-off and Pecking Order Prediction About Dividens and Debt. The Review of Financial Studies, 15, 1 – 33.
Frank, M.Z. & Goyal, V.K. (2003). Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure., Journal of Financial Economics, 67 (2), 217-248.
Jahanzeb, A., Rehman, S.U., Bajuri, N.H., Karami, M., & Ahmadimousaabad, A. (2014). Trade-off theory, pecking order theory and market timing theory: a comprehensive review of capital structure theories. International Journal Of Management And Commerce Innovations (IJMCI) 1 (1), 11-18.
Jong, A.D., Verbeek, M. & Verwijmeren, P. (2010). The Impact of financing surpluses and large financing deficits on tests of the pecking order theory. Financial Management, 39(2), 733 – 756.
Komera, S. & Lukose, J.P.J. (2014). Capital structure choice, information asymmetry, and debt capacity: evidence from India. Journal of Economics and Finance, 39(4), 807-823.
Lemmon, M. L., & Zender, F. (2010). Debt capacitiy and tests of capital structure theories. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 45, 1161 1187.
Lestari, S. (2015). Determinan struktur modal dalam perspektif pecking order theory dan agency theory (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang listing di BEI Tahun 2010-2013). Jurnal Wahana Riset Akuntansi , 3, 571-590.
Mahakud, J. (2006).Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure: evidence from the Indian corporate sectorâ€, The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 12 (11), 16-26.
Myers, S. (2001). Capital structure. Journal of Economic Perspective 15 (2), 81-102.
Oolderink, P. (2014). Determminants of capital structure: static trade off theory vs. pecking order theory. IBA Bachelor Thesis Conference 2013. University of Twente.
Rachmawati, E. (2009). Pengujian teori pecking order dalam pembentukan struktur modal pada perusahaan-perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar di BEI Periode 2001-2007.
Radjamin, I.J.P, & Sudana I.M. (2014). Penerapan pecking order theory dan kaitannya dengan pemilihan struktur modal perusahaan pada sektor manufaktur di negara Indonesia Dan Negara Australia. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Indonesia, 1(3), 451-468.
Seifert, B. & Halit Gonenc. (2010). Pecking order behavior in emerging markets. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 21, 1 31.
Shyam-Sunder, L., & Myers, S.C. (1999). Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(2) 219-244.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright @2023. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium.
