Evaluasi Cobit dan Perancangan IT Balanced Scorecard untuk Perbaikan Penerapan System Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2015.14.3.1Abstract
Abstrak. Prosedur system development life cycle (SDLC) mempunyai peranan penting dalam proses pengembangan sistem di Divisi Teknologi Sistem Informasi (TSI) Bank BRI. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memilih proses IT COBIT yang digunakan sebagai fokus area evaluasi penerapan SDLC, menilai maturity level dari penerapan SDLC, memberikan rekomendasi perbaikan penerapan SDLC, dan merancang kerangka kerja IT balanced scorecard (IT BSC) tentang perbaikan penerapan SDLC. Metode pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling dan maturity model COBIT 4.1 sebagai alat assessment untuk mengukur maturity level dari penerapan SDLC melalui sebuah survei. Data hasil survei dianalisa dengan analisis maturity level dan analisis gap. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Divisi TSI berada pada maturity level 3 (Defined Process). Analisis gap menghasilkan rekomendasi perbaikan berdasarkan detail control objective (DCO) COBIT yang tidak memenuhi expected maturity level (EML). Akhirnya rekomendasi perbaikan disajikan dalam bentuk kerangka kerja IT BSC.
Kata kunci: system life cycle development, IT balanced scorecard, COBIT 4.1, detail control objective, maturity level
Abstract. System development life cycle (SDLC) procedures has an important role in the process of system development in BRI Information Systems Technology (TSI) Division. This research aims to select the COBIT IT processes that are used as evaluation focus area of SDLC implementation, assess the maturity level of SDLC implementation, provide recommendations for improvement of SDLC implementation, and design a framework IT balanced scorecard (IT BSC) about improvement of SDLC implementation. The sampling method using purposive sampling and maturity models COBIT 4.1 as an assessment tool to measure the maturity level of SDLC implementation through a survey. Survey data were analyzed with a maturity level analysis and gap analysis. The results showed that the TSI Division is at maturity level 3 (Defined Process). Gap analysis generates recommendations for improvements based on detailed control objectives (DCO) COBIT that has not reached the expected maturity level (EML). Finally recommendations for improvement of SDLC implementation presented in the form of framework IT BSC.
Keywords: system life cycle development, IT balanced scorecard, COBIT 4.1, detail control objective, maturity level
Downloads
References
Amid, A., & Moradi, S. (2013). A Hybrid Evaluation Framework of CMM and COBIT for Improving the Software Development Quality. Journal of Software Engineering and Application, 6, 280-288.
Ayat, M., Masrom, M., & Sahibuddin, S. (2011). IT Governance and Small Medium Enterprises. International Journal of Software and Computer Applications, 9, 168-173.
Bassil, Y. (2012). A Simulation Model For The Waterfall Software Development Life Cycle. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 2(5), 1-7.
[BI] Bank Indonesia (ID). (2007). Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 2009 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Resiko Dalam Penggunaan Teknologi Informasi Oleh Bank Umum. Jakarta: BI. Available at www.ojk.go.id. [accessed 21 Juni 2015].
Grembergen, W.V. (2000). The Balanced Scorecard and IT Governance. Information System Control Journal, 2, 40-43.
Grembergen, W.V., Haes, S.D., & Amelinckx, I. (2003). Using COBIT and the Balanced Scorecard as Instruments for Service Level Management. Information System Control Journal, 4, 1-7.
Grembergen, W.V., & Haes, S.D. (2005). Measuring and Improving IT Governance Through The Balanced Scorecard. Information System Control Journal, 2, 1-8.
Gunardi, Sulistyo, D., & Suryana, T. (2012). Usulan Peta Strategi Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Pendekatan Analisis Critical Success Factor Dan IT Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Ilmiah UNIKOM, 10(1), 143-153.
Haes, S.D., & Grembergen, W.V. (2004). IT Governance and Its Mechanisms. Journal of Information Systems Audit and Control, 1, 1-7.
[ISACA] Information Systems Audit and Control Association (US). (2010). IT Standards, Guidelines, and Tools and Techniques for Audit and Assurance and Control Professionals. Rolling Meadows: ISACA. Available at www.isaca.org. [accessed 21 Juni 2015].
[ITGI] Information Technology Governance Institute (US). (2007). COBIT v4.1. Rolling Meadows: ITGI. ISBN: 1-933284-72-2.
[KBUMN] Kementrian Badan Usaha Milik Negara RI. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Badan Usaha Milik Negara Nomor 2 Tahun 2013 tentang Panduan Penyusunan Pengelolaan Teknologi Informasi Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Jakarta: Kementrian Badan Usaha Milik Negara RI. Available at www.bumn.go.id. [accessed 21 Juni 2015].
Kendall, K.E., & Julie, E.K. (2010). Systems Analysis and Design 8th edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. ISBN: 978-0-13-608916-2.
Khther, R.A., & Othman, M. (2013). COBIT Framework As a Guideline of Effective IT Governance in Higher Education. International Journal of Information Technology Convergence and Services, 3(1), 21-29.
Kumar, N., Zadgaonkar, A.S., & Shukla, A. (2013). Evolving a New Software Development Life Cycle Model SDLC-2013 with Client Satisfaction. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering, 3(1), 216-221.
Latif, A.A., & Hanifi, N. (2013). Analyzing IT Function Using COBIT 4.1 – A Case Study of Malaysian Private University. Journal of Economics, Business, and Management, 1(4), 406-408.
Mahnic, V., & Natasa, Z. (2008). Using COBIT Indicators for Measuring Scrum-based Software Development. Journal WSEAS Transaction on Computer, 7(10), 1605-1617.
Nurhidayat, B. (2011). Evaluasi Integrated Toll Collection System Dengan Menggunakan Framework COBIT. [Tesis]. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Octavia, R. (2014). Analisis Tingkat Kematangan Penyediaan Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi di PDII-LIPI Menggunakan Framework COBIT 4.1. [Tesis]. Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Pederiva, A. (2003). The COBIT Maturity Model in a Vendor Evaluation Case. Information System Control Journal, 3, 1-4.
Rahmayuni, I., & Yusda, I. (2014). IT Governance Balanced Scorecard Untuk Mengukur Kinerja Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Momentum, 16(2), 88-94.
Rosmansyah, Y., Mubarok, H., & Yunanto, R. (2012). Implementation of Information Technology Balanced Scorecard in An Agriculture Organization. International Journal of Administrative Science and Organization, 19(2), 79-85.
Surbakti, H. (2014). COBIT 4.1: A Maturity Level Framework For Measurement of Information System Performance (Case Study: Academic Bureau at Universitas Respati Yogyakarta). International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 3(8), 999-1004.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright @2023. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium.
