Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic has emphasized the need for financial performance improvement, especially in Indonesia’s rapidly growing e-commerce sector. Manual processes are time-consuming and error-prone, making it difficult to reward productivity effectively. This study develops QuickPack, an Android Studio-based app to track packers in an online shop, enhancing efficiency through automation technology. Using the Waterfall model, Firebase, and Kotlin, QuickPack provides real-time performance tracking. Researchers applied qualitative methods, observing and interviewing packers, managers, and owners before and after implementation. The app offers features like user registration, receipt tracking, daily monitoring, performance reporting, and target setting. Results show a 63% financial performance boost and an 80-90% speed increase on peak days. QuickPack reduces labor costs, minimizes errors, improves productivity, and streamlines operations, lowering the need for additional staff. Monetization opportunities, such as premium tracking services, further enhance revenue. Improved security also mitigates fraud risks. Modernizing operations, QuickPack increases revenue, reduces financial risks, and enhances job satisfaction through transparent performance tracking. Successfully developed and tested, the app improves packing efficiency and strengthens financial performance for online shops.


Keywords: QuickPack application, e-commerce, automation technology, financial performance, performance tracking



Keywords

QuickPack Application Financial Performance Performance Tracking E-Commerce Automation Technology

Article Details

How to Cite
Memarista, G., & Oden, N. (2025). Boosting E-Commerce Financial Performance with QuickPack: An Android-Based Packer Tracking Solution. The Asian Journal of Technology Management (AJTM), 18(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.2025.18.2.4

References

  1. Adiguzel, Z., & Cakir, F. S. (2022). Examining the Effects of Strategic Orientation and Motivation on Performance and Innovation in the Production Sector of Automobile Spare Parts. European Journal of Management Studies, 27(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejms-01-2022-0007
  2. Benoit, S., Klose, S., & Ettinger, A. (2017). Linking service convenience to satisfaction: Dimensions and key moderators. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(6), 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-10-2016-0353
  3. Caputo, F., Cillo, V., Candelo, E., & Liu, Y. (2019). Innovating through digital revolution. Management Decision, 57(8), 2032–2051. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2018-0833
  4. Chak, C. M., Carminati, L., & Wilderom, C. P. M. (2023). Hope, Goal-Commitment and -Stress Mediating between Collaborative Leadership, Financial Resources and Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(10), 2785–2807. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2021-0280
  5. Chasapis, P., Mitropoulos, S., & Douligeris, C. (2023). A Prototype Mobile Application for the Athens Numismatic Museum. Applied Computing and Informatics, 19(1–2), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2019.06.001
  6. Davis, S., & Neves, N. C. (2021). e-Conomy SEA 2021_Roaring 20s: The SEA Digital Decade. https://goo.gle/3wvjOQR
  7. Jain, V., Malviya, B., & Arya, S. (2021). An Overview of Electronic Commerce (e-Commerce). Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(3), 665–670. https://doi.org/10.47750/cibg.2021.27.03.090
  8. Jayatilleke, B. G., Ranawaka, G. R., Wijesekera, C., & Kumarasinha, M. C. B. (2019). Development of Mobile Application through Design-Based Research. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-02-2018-0013
  9. Jorge, O., Pons, A., Rius, J., Vintró, C., Mateo, J., & Vilaplana, J. (2020). Increasing Online Shop Revenues with Web Scraping: a Case Study for the Wine Sector. British Food Journal, 122(11), 3383–3401. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2019-0522
  10. Kahrović, E., & Avdović, A. (2023). Impact of digital technologies on business performance in Serbia. Management:Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, 28(2), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2021.0039
  11. Karttunen, E., Lintukangas, K., & Hallikas, J. (2023). Digital Transformation of The Purchasing and Supply Management process. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 53(5–6), 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-06-2022-0199
  12. Marino-Romero, J. A., Palos-Sanchez, P. R., & Velicia-Martin, F. (2023). Improving KIBS Performance Using Digital Transformation: Study Based on the Theory of Resources and Capabilities. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 33(2), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-04-2022-0095
  13. Memarista, G., Kristyanto, V. S., & Kristina, N. (2022). What drives Indonesian financial satisfaction in the pandemic? Jurnal Manajemen Maranatha, 21(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.28932/jmm.v21i2.4645
  14. Nasiri, M., Saunila, M., & Ukko, J. (2022). Digital Orientation, Digital Maturity, and Digital Intensity: Determinants of Financial Success in Digital Transformation Settings. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 42(13), 274–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-09-2021-0616
  15. Nguyen, N. P., Evangelista, F., & Kieu, T. A. (2019). The Contingent Roles of Perceived Budget Fairness, Budget Goal Commitment and Vertical Information Sharing in Driving Work Performance. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 26(1), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-06-2018-0026
  16. Nuanmeesri, S. (2023). Mobile Application for the Purpose of Marketing, Product Distribution and Location-Based Logistics for Elderly Farmers. Applied Computing and Informatics, 19(1–2), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2019.11.001
  17. Oliveira, V., Teixeira, L., & Ebert, F. (2020). On the Adoption of Kotlin on Android Development: A Triangulation Study. 2020 IEEE 27th International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER48275.2020.9054859
  18. Pålsson, H., & Sandberg, E. (2020). Paradoxes in Supply Chains: a Conceptual Framework for Packed Products. International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(3), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-12-2019-0338
  19. Rakhmasari, A. A., & Anwar, D. (2018). An Analysis and Design of a Virtual Collaboration Information System of the Jamu Supply Chain Network Based on a Fair Adaptive contract. In Emerald Reach Proceedings Series (Vol. 1, pp. 539–545). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-793-1-00008
  20. Saunila, M., Ukko, J., & Rantanen, H. (2014). Does Innovation Capability Really Matter for the Profitability of SMEs? Knowledge and Process Management, 21(2), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1442
  21. Senadjki, A., Au Yong, H. N., Ganapathy, T., & Ogbeibu, S. (2024). Unlocking the Potential: the Impact of Digital Leadership on Firms’ Performance through Digital Transformation. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 4(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbsed-06-2023-0050
  22. Silva, T. B. de J., Dal Magro, C. B., Rocha, J. S. da, & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2024). Management Control Systems and Dynamic Capabilities as Antecedents to Financial Performance. European Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMS-08-2023-0061
  23. Vion. (2023, June 15). [New report] Ecommerce in Southeast Asia Achieved ~US$ 100 billion GMV in 2022. Momentum Works, 1–2.
  24. Waldman, D. A., Putnam, L. L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Siegel, D. (2019). The role of paradox theory in decision making and management research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 155, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.04.006
  25. Yüksel, H. (2022). Industry 4.0 Transformation: Factors Affecting Adoption and Impacts on Companies. International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 4(3), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijieom-06-2022-0020