Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Abstract. Industry 4.0 become popular when it launched first time in 2011. This revolution refers to interconnection of manufacturing system, which known as Internet of Things. As Indonesia embrace the challenge in 2018, PT SKY, an Indonesia aerospace manufacturing company start the initiative at 2020, by configure digital council. This is to facilitate automation and digitalization initiative within the organization. The team member is part timer from cross function department, who passionate and occupy by self-develop skill on it. Recent challenge of growth of customer demand, and some constraint face by digital council, management view an opportunity to be cost competitive organization company, by develop more focus on automation and digitalization. However, a challenge for company in low-cost country, require proper strategy approach. Based on organization design theory, strategy, and organization structure, have correlation. This study explores the propose organizational design for the company. A decision-making analysis performed thru AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) approach to select highest ranking of three alternatives of organization structure, with three criteria. Result analysis show hybrid as highest-ranking score 0.464, then follow by semi structured interview, thematic data analysis, to collect the insight from the team. Based on research execution, the study able to recommends hybrid organization structure with three important actions, to bridge from current digital council ad hoc organization.


 Keywords:  Organization design, manufacturing, AHP, Industry 4.0

Keywords

Organization Design Manufacturing AHP Industry 4.0

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright @2017. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium 

How to Cite
Ekawati, D., & Yudoko, G. (2024). The Organizational Design for Automation and Digitalization Initiative using Analytical Hierarchy Process – A Case Study of an Aerospace Manufacturer in Indonesia . The Asian Journal of Technology Management (AJTM), 17(3), 160–179. https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.2024.17.3.2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ardhana, Y. (2022). Kepner-Tregoe Problem Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process to Select Best Solution for Nitrogen Supply Shortage at Refinery Unit VI Balongan. Bandung Institute of Technology.
  2. Bals, L., & Turkulainen, V. (2017). Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management Achieving e ffi ciency and e ff ectiveness in Purchasing and Supply Management : Organization design and outsourcing. 23(June), 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2017.06.003
  3. Bhadu, J., Bhamu, J., & Saraswat, P. (2023). An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach for Prioritizing the Industries 4.0 Technologies (I4.0T). Evergreen, 10(2), 667–675. https://doi.org/10.5109/6792813
  4. Braunschweig, T. (2001). Analytic hierarchy process. Planning Agricultural Research: A Sourcebook, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851994017.0231
  5. Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design, Tenth Edition (Tenth Edit). South-Western Cengage Learning.
  6. Dess, Gregory G, McNamara, Gerry, Eisner, A. B. (2016). Strategic Management, Text & Cases (Eight Edit). McGraw-Hill Education.
  7. Farooquie, H., & Akhtar, A. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Indian Manufacturing: An AHP Approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 0(2018), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.46254/in01.20210139
  8. Fecher, F., Winding, J., Hutter, K., & Füller, J. (2018). Innovation labs from a participants ’ perspective. Journal of Business Research, May, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.039
  9. Jaspert, D., & Ebel, M. (2022). Settings of Organizational Adjustments due to Digital Servitization. 1278–1287.
  10. Ministry of Industry. (2018). Revolusi Industri 4.o di Indonesia. In Interciencia (Vol. 30, Issue 8).
  11. Németh, B., Molnár, A., Bozóki, S., Wijaya, K., Inotai, A., Campbell, J. D., & Kaló, Z. (2019). Comparison of weighting methods used in multicriteria decision analysis frameworks in healthcare with focus on low-and middle-income countries. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 8(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0102
  12. Rahman, S., Ghosh, T., Ferdous, N., Kaiser, M. S., Anannya, M., & Hosen, A. S. M. S. (2023). Measurement : Sensors Machine learning and internet of things in industry 4 . 0 : A review. Measurement: Sensors, 28(January), 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2023.100822
  13. Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
  14. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 9(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijssci.2008.017590
  15. Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process 2nd edition. Springer Science.
  16. Sajjad, A., Ahmad, W., & Hussain, S. (2022). Decision Making Process Development for Industry 4.0 Transformation. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 16(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/147237
  17. Saunders, M. N. K., Adrian, T., & Lewis, P. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students. In Pearson Education International.