Method of Payment Adoption in Indonesia E-Commerce
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.2019.12.2.2Keywords:
online payment, e-payment, virtual account, prepaid payment, e-bankingAbstract
Abstract. The emergence of e-commerce nowadays needs a payment method that supports speed and easiness of the transaction. Payment options that are provided by the e-commerce platform influence the customer purchase decision making, but the security of data still becoming an issue for seller and buyer in the e-commerce system. There are popular methods of payment in Indonesian e-commerce, they are transfer, cash on delivery, point of service, virtual account, credit card, and prepaid account. This research aim is to explore the behaviors of Indonesian e-commerce customers based on their ownership and preferred method of payment. This research used a quantitative approach, researchers have surveyed 492 Indonesian e-commerce customer that have shopping experience in e-commerce platforms (website, phone application, etc.). The proposed model in this study has five independent variables from the UTAUT (Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology) model and its development from other research. The findings of this research are the method of payment that needs less effort to use is used more often in e-commerce transaction, financial benefit is not a factor that attracts an e-commerce customer to have a method of payment, but they very consider fee that is charged because of using a method of payment, and the higher an account holder perceived security of a method of payment, the higher they keep the account balance.
Keywords: E-commerce, payment adoption, payment fee, prepaid payment, UTAUTDownloads
References
Arango, C., Huyunh, K. P., & Sabetti, L. (2015). Consumer payment choice: merchant card acceptance versus pricing incentive. Journal of Banking & Finance, 55, 130-141.
Bergström, A. (2015). Online privacy concerns: A broad approach to understanding the concerns of different groups for different uses. Computers in Human, Behavior, 53, 419-426. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.025
Cao, Q., & Niu, X. (2019). Integrating context-awareness and UTAUT to explain Alipay user adoption. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 69, 9–13. Doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2018.09.004
Chou, Y., Lee, C., & Chung, J. (2004). Understanding m-commerce payment systems through the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1423–1430. Doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00432-0
Corbitt, B. J., Thanasankit, T., & Yi, H. (2003). Trust and e-commerce: a study of consumer perceptions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2, 203–215.
Dietz, M. Härle, P. Hyde, P. Kapoor, A. Lemerle, & M. Nauck, F. (2014). The road back: mckinsey global banking annual review 2014. New York, USA: McKinsey & Company.
Evans, D. S., & Pirchio, A. (2015). An Empirical Examination of Why Mobile Money Schemes Ignite in Some Developing Countries but Flounder in Most. Review of Networks Economics, 1–55. Doi: 10.1515/rne-2015-0020
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59, 451–474. Doi: 10.1016/S10715819(03)00111-3
Gholami, R., Ogun, A., Koh, E., & Lim, J. (2010). Factors Affecting e-Payment Adoption in Nigeria. Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations, 8 (4), 51–67. doi: 10.4018/jeco.2010100104
Grant, A. (2016). Originals. London, UK: WH Allen.
Grüschow, R.M., Kemper, J., & Brettel, M. (2016). How do different payment methods deliver cost and credit efficiency in electronic commerce? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 18 (2016), 27-36.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006) Multivariate data analysis. Sixth Edition. Pearson Preantice Hall.
Hille, P., Walsh, G., & Cleveland, M. (2015). Consumer fear of online identity theft: scale development and validation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 30, 1-19.
Hutabarat, A. (2016). Gubernur BI Resmikan Bank Indonesia Fintech Office. Ruang Media Bank Indonesia. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia. Available at http://www.bi.go.id [accesed 30 May 2017].
Iman, N. (2018). Is mobile payment still relevant in the fintech era?. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 30, 72–82. Doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2018.05.009
Junadi, & Sfenrianto. (2015). A Model of Factors Influencing Consumer’s Intention to Use E-payment System in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 59, 214–220. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.557
Kim, C., Tao, W., Shin, N., Kim, K. (2010). An empirical study of customer’s perceptions of security and trust in e-payment systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9, 84-95.
Klein, A. (2019). Is China’ s new payment system the future? The Brookings Institution, June 2019.
Kousaridas, A., Parissis, G., & Apostolopoulos, T. (2008). An open financial services architecture based on the use of intelligent mobile devices. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.04.003
Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J. and Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2014). Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 464-478. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.022.
Morse, E. A., and Raval, V. (2008). Security and payment card industry regulation. PCI DSS: Payment Card Security Data Security Standard in context. Computer Law & Security Report, 24, 540-554.
Putri, N. R. R., Rahadi, R. A., & Murtaqi, I. (2017). A Conceptual Study on the Use of Electronic Payment Instruments among Generation Z in Bandung City. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship, 3(9), 32–40.
Shen, C., & Chiou, J. (2010). The impact of perceived ease of use on Internet service adoption: The moderating effects of temporal distance and perceived risk. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 42–50. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.07.003
Sproule, S., & Norm P. Archer (2007), Defining identity theft. EighthWorld Congress on the Management of eBusiness (WCMeB 2007). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4285319.
Stavins, J. (2018). Consumer preferences for payment methods: role of discounts and surcharges. Journal of Banking and Finance, 94(September), 35–53. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.06.013
Tak, P., & Panwar, S. (2017). Using UTAUT 2 model to predict mobile app based shopping: evidences from India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 9(3), 248–264. Doi: 10.1108/JIBR-11-2016-0132
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting Different Conceptualizations of System Use: The Competing Roles of Behavioral Intention, Facilitating Conditions, and Behavioral Expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 483–502.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view”. MISQuarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Woo, J. (2006). The right not to be identified: privacy and anonymity in the interactive media environment. New Media & Society, 8(6), 949–967. Doi: 10.1177/1461444806069650
Yang, Q., Pang, C., Liu, L., Yen, D. C., & Tarn, J. M. (2015). Exploring consumer perceived risk and trust for online payments: An empirical study in China’s younger generation. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 9-24.
Zalan, T. & Toufaily, E. (2017). The Promise of Fintech in Emerging Markets: Not as Disruptive. Contemporary Economics, 11 (4), 415–430. Doi: 10.5709/ce.1897-9254.253
Zinman, J. (2009). Debit or credit?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33, 358-366.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Copyright @2017. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium
Site using