Open Journal Systems

Regional Innovation System Performance in Indonesia: Case of Semarang and Balikpapan

Zulfika Satria Kusharsanto, Wiwandari Handayani, Artiningsih Artiningsih


Abstract. Innovation system which promotes knowledge-based economy, instead of factor-driven economy, has been realized by many countries to be an obligatory system to improve national or regional competitiveness. It requires the collaboration of all stakeholders which are related to development to enhance innovation with specialization as the competitiveness value. Semarang and Balikpapan, two emerging cities in Indonesia, has implemented regional innovation system (RIS) with their own strengths and weaknesses. This study uses conceptual analysis with qualitative and quantitative methodology and The Innovation Policy Framework as tool to assess both cities’ performance. The study finds that both cities have basic understanding about innovation with specialization such as Semarang develops innovation in city tourism while Balikpapan enhances innovation in green economy. The hard challenges faced by both cities are integration of all stakeholders in enhancing innovation that however is still partially implemented. At the end, this study draws the concept of both cities to develop the system yet without neglecting their existed performance.


Keywords: Balikpapan, collaboration, knowledge-based economy, regional innovation system, Semarang


Balikpapan, collaboration, knowledge-based economy, regional innovation system, Semarang

Full Text:



Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: theory, empirics and policy. Regional Studies, 45(7), 875–891.

Baier, S. L., Dwyer, G. P., & Tamura, R. (2006). How important are capital and total factor productivity for economic growth? Economic Inquiry, 44(1), 23–49.

Begg, I. (1999). Cities and competitiveness. urban studies, 36(January), 795–809.

Bröcker, J., Dohse, D., & Soltwedel, R. (2003). Innovation clusters and interregional competition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Retrieved from

Cooke, P. (2001). Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Ind Corp Change, 10(4), 945–974.

Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk, H. J. (2004). Regional innovation systems: the role of governance in a globalized world. Routledge. Retrieved from,+P.+N.+C.,+Heidenreich,+M.,+%26+Braczyk,+H.+J.+(Eds.).+(2004).+Regional+innovation+systems.+Routledge.&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Dias Avila, A. F., & Evenson, R. E. (2010). Chapter 72 Total factor productivity growth in agriculture. the role of technological capital. handbook of agricultural economics (Vol. 4).

Duke, C., Etzkowitz, H., Rhee, B.-S., & Kitagawa, F. (2006). Supporting the contribution of higher education institutions to regional development, peer review report: Busan, Republic of Korea. OECD. Retrieved from

Fagerberg, J., & Srholec, M. (2008). National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development. Research Policy, 37(9), 1417–1435.

Fischer, M. M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(2), 199–216.

Furner, J. (2006). Conceptual analysis: a method for understanding information as evidence, and evidence as information. Archival Science, 4(3–4), 233–265.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in Dynamically-competitive Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 13.

Hall, P. (2000). Creative cities and economic development. Urban Studies, 37(4), 639–649.

Intarakumnerd, P., Chairatana, P., & Tangchitpiboon, T. (2002). National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1445–1457.

Klein Woolthuis, R., Lankhuizen, M., & Gilsing, V. (2005). A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25(6), 609–619.

Lakitan, B. (2013). Connecting all the dots: Identifying the “actor level†challenges in establishing effective innovation system in Indonesia. Technology in Society, 35(1), 41–54.

Llerena, P., Matt, M., & Avadikyan, A. (2005). Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy : theory and practice. Springer. Retrieved from,+Patrick,+Mireille+Matt.+(2006).+Innovation+Policy+in+a+Knowledge-Based+Economy:+Theory+and+Practice.+Springer+Science+%26+Business+Media+&lr=&source=gbs_navlinks_s

Motohashi, K. (2005). University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34(5), 583–594.

Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2009). Universities in National Innovation Systems. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, 209–239.

Natahadibrata, N. (2014, August 14). Seven Indonesian cities “˜most livableâ€â„¢: Survey. The Jakarta Post. Jakarta. Retrieved from

OECD. (1999). Managing National Innovation Systems, France. Oecd (Vol. 26).

Ridder, H.-G. (2012). Yin , Robert K .: Case Study Research . Design and Methods. Zeitschrift Für Personalforschung, 26(1), 93–96.

Scoville, J. G. (1986). The traditional industrial sector in developing countries: an update on its role and functioning. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 45(3), 313–328.

Seo, J. K., Cho, M., & Skelton, T. (2015). “Dynamic Busanâ€: Envisioning a global hub city in Korea. Cities, 46, 26–34.

Taufik, T. A. (2005). Pengembangan Sistem Inovasi Daerah: Perspektif Kebijakan. Badan Pengkajian dan Penerapan Teknologi.

Yongze, Y. (2011). Innovation cluster, government support and the technological innovation efficiency: based on spatial econometrics of panel data with provincial data. Economic Review, 12(2)



  • There are currently no refbacks.