Kinerja Sektor Industri Manufaktur Provinsi Jawa Barat Berdasarkan Lokasi di Dalam dan di Luar Kawasan Industri

Authors

  • Winardi Winardi Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Dominicus Savio Priyarsono Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Hermanto Siregar Sekolah Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Heru Kustanto Direktorat Jenderal Pengembangan Perwilayahan Industri, Kementerian Perindustrian

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2017.16.3.2

Keywords:

Manufacturing Industry, Industrial Estate, Social Accounting Matrix

Abstract

Abstrak. Sektor industri manufaktur merupakan motor penggerak perekonomian suatu wilayah. Peran sektor industri manufaktur di suatu wilayah akan lebih optimal apabila pada wilayah tersebut terdapat lokasi-lokasi industri yang ketersediaan infrastruktur dasar, infrastruktur penunjang dan sarana penunjang yang memadai. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perbandingan kinerja sektor industri manufaktur di Provinsi Jawa Barat berdasarkan lokasi di dalam kawasan industri dan di luar kawasan industri. Model analisis menggunakan Model Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) yang dilakukan disagregasi ke dalam sektor industri manufaktur yang berlokasi di dalam dan di luar kawasan industri. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa sektor industri manafaktur yang berlokasi di dalam kawasan industri mempunyai kinerja yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan sektor industri manufaktur yang berlokasi di luar kawasan industri. Kinerja dimaksud adalah dalam peningkatan nilai tambah faktor produksi baik faktor tenaga kerja maupun faktor modal dan kinerja dalam peningkatan pendapatan masyarakat.

Kata kunci : Industri manufaktur, kawasan industri, SAM, nilai tambah, pendapatan rumah tangga

 

Abstract. Manufacturing industry sector is the driving force of the economy of a region. The role of manufacturing industry sector in a region will be more optimal if in the region there are industrial locations that availability of basic infrastructure, supporting infrastructure and adequate supporting facilities. This study aims to analyze the performance comparison of manufacturing industry sectors of West Java Province Based on location inside and outside industrial estates. The analytical model uses the Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Model which is disaggregated into the manufacturing industry sectors located within and outside the industrial estate. The results of the analysis show that industrial sector manafaktur located in industrial estate have better performance compared with manufacturing industry sector which is located outside industrial area. Performance is meant in the increase of value added factors of production both labor factors and capital and performance factors in increasing public revenues.

Keyword: Manufacturing industry, industrial estate, social accounting matrix, value added, household income

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexande, P.C. (1963). Industrial estates in India. Asia Pub. House.
Becattini, G. & Musotti, F. (2003). Measuring the district effect. Reflections on the literature, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review. 226:259–290.
Bredo, W. (1960). Industrial Estatate for Tool Industrialzation. International Industrial Development Center. Stanford Research Institute.
Cainelli, G. (2008). Spatial Agglomeration, Technological Innovations, and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Italian Industrial Districts. Growth and Change, 39 (3), 414–435.
Ellison, G. & Glaeser, EL. (1997). Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach. Journal of Political Economy. 105(5):889-927.
Fujita, M. & Thiesse, JF. (2002). Economics of Agglomeration: Cities, Industrial Location and Regional Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Isard, W. (1956). Location and Space Economy. New York: Jhon Wley & Sons, Inc.
Kuncoro, M. (2000). Ekonomi Pembangunan : Teori, Masalah, dan Kebijakan. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.
Kuncoro, M. (2002). Analisis Spasial dan Regional Studi Aglomerasi & Kluster Industri Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.
Kwanda, T. (2000). Pengembangan Kawasan Industri di Indonesia. Dimensi Teknik Arsitektur, 28(1), 54– 61.
Morales, F. & Fernandes, M. (2003). The Impact of Industrial District Affiliation on Firm Value Creation. European Planning Studies. 11(2).
Mulyadi, D. (2012). Manajemen Perwilayahan Industri. Jakarta: Kementerian Perindustrian.
Perry, M. & Yeoh, C. (2000). Singapore's Overseas Industrial Park. Regional Studies, 34 (2), 199.
Sutomo, M. (2015). Sistem Data dan Perangkat Analisis Ekonomi Makro. Bandung: CorBooks.
Thorbeche, E. (1988). The Social Accounting Matrix dan Consistency-Type. Washington. D.C.: The World Bank.
UNIDO. (1997). Industrial Estates Principles and Practice. Technical Report. United Nations Industrial Development Organization.
UNIDO. (2012). Europe and Central Asia Regional Conference on Industrial Parks as a tool to foster local industrial development. Baku, Azerbaijan.
Wang, J. (2013). The economic impact of Special Economic Zones: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Journal of Development Economics, 101,133–147
Zheng, S., Sun, W., Wu, J., & Kahn, ME. (2016). Urban Agglomeration and Local Economic Growth in China: The Role of New Industrial Park. USC Dornsife Institute fo New Economic Thingking. Working Paper: 16-06.

Downloads

Submitted

2017-09-29

Accepted

2017-12-15

Published

2017-12-30

How to Cite

Winardi, W., Priyarsono, D. S., Siregar, H., & Kustanto, H. (2017). Kinerja Sektor Industri Manufaktur Provinsi Jawa Barat Berdasarkan Lokasi di Dalam dan di Luar Kawasan Industri. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 16(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2017.16.3.2

Issue

Section

Articles