Orientasi Kewirausahaan pada Kinerja Usaha Kecil dan Menengah (UKM) Sumatera Barat: Analisis Peran Moderasi dari Intensitas Persaingan, Turbulensi Pasar dan Teknologi

Authors

  • Yunia Wardi Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia
  • Perengki Susanto Graduate School of Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Nor Liza Abdullah Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2017.16.1.4

Keywords:

Orientasi Kewirausahaan, Intensitas Persaingan, Turbulensi Pasar dan Teknologi, dan Kinerja UKM

Abstract

Abstrak. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis pengaruh orientasi kewirausahaan meliputi keinovasian, keproaktifan, dan keberanian dalam mengambil risiko terhadap kinerja UKM Sumatera Barat yang dimoderasi oleh intensitas per¬saingan, turbulensi pasar dan teknologi. Populasi penelitian adalah seluruh pimpinan atau pemilik UKM pada komoditas produk/jasa usaha unggulan di Sumatera Barat. Sampel penelitian adalah sebagian dari pimpinan atau pemilik UKM pada komoditas produk/jasa usaha unggulan dengan menggunakan metode penyampelan non-probabilitas, yaitu sampel bertujuan. Ukuran sampel (sample size) diambil sebanyak 400 sampel. Penelitian ini menggunakan moderated regression analysis (MRA). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa orientasi kewirausahaan meliputi keinovasian, keproaktifan dan keberanian mengambil risiko berpengaruh secara signifikan pada kinerja UKM di Sumatera Barat. Namun, intensitas persaingan, turbulensi pasar dan teknologi tidak mampu memperkuat pengaruh orientasi kewirausahaan terhadap kinerja UKM di Sumatera Barat. Implikasi manajerial dalam penelitian ini didiskusikan kemudian. 

Kata Kunci: Orientasi kewirausahaan, intensitas persaingan, turbulensi pasar dan teknologi, dan kinerja UKM


Abstract. The purpose of this study is to analyse the effect of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) include innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking on performance of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in West Sumatra moderated by competitive intensity, market, and technological turbulence. The population of the study was all managers or owners of leading products/services of SMEs in West Sumatra. Further, samples were taken by using nonprobabilities sampling method i.e. purposive sampling. The sample size used in the analysis of 400 samples. Data were analyzed by using moderated regression analysis (MRA). The findings show that EO includes innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking have a significant effect on SMEs performance in West Sumatra. However, the moderating effect of competitive intensity, market and technological turbulence on the relationship between EO and SMEs performance were not supported. Managerial implications of the findings are then discussed. 

Keywords: Entrepreneurial orientation, competitive intensity, market and technological turbulence, and SMEs performance

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yunia Wardi, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia

Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi UNP

Guru Besar IV / d (Dekan Fakultas Ekonomi UNP Padang)

References

Ambad, S. N. A., & Wahab, K. A. (2016). The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian Large Companies. International Journal of Business and Society, 17 (2), 259.
Apindo (2012). 37th Confederation of Employer (ACE) CEO and Board of Director Meeting. Apindo Country Report. In Singapura 12 Mei 2012.
Bank Indonesia (2012). Komoditi, Produk Jasa Usaha Unggulan (KPJU) Sumatera Barat Tahun 2011. Laporan Penelitian. Kerjasama Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Padang dan Bank Indonesia.
Bank Indonesia (2015) Profil Bisnis Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah (UMKM). Laporan Penelitian. Kerjasama Lembaga Pengembangan Perbankan Indonesia dan Bank Indonesia.
Bamford, C. E., & Bruton, G. D. (2011). Entrepreneurship a small business approach. McGraw-Hill.
Brouthers, K. D., Nakos, G., & Dimitratos, P. (2015). SME entrepreneurial orientation, international performance, and the moderating role of strategic alliances. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 30(1), 57-81.
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic management journal, 10(1), 75-87.
Cooper, P. S. & Schindler, P. S. (2011). Business research methods. 11th Edition. Mcgraw-hill.
Dai, L., Maksimov, V., Gilbert, B. A., & Fernhaber, S. A. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: The differential roles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(4), 511- 524.
Dess, G.G. & Lumpkin, G.T. (2005). The role of entreprenurial orientation in Stimulating effective corporate Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 19(1), 147-156.
Dimitratos, P., Lioukas, S., & Carter, S. (2004). Relationship between entrepreneurship and international performance: The importance of domestic environment. International Business Review, 13, 19-41.
D’Amoise, G & Muldowney, M. (1988). Management theory for small business: attempts and requirements. Academy of Management Review, 13(2), 226- 240.
Engelen, A., Neumann, C., & Schmidt, S. (2016). Should entrepreneurially oriented firms have narcissistic CEOs? Journal of Management, 42(3), 698-721
Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Möller, T., & Brettel, M. (2015). How Entrepreneurial Firms Profit From Pricing Capabilities: An Examination of Technology‐Based Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(5), 1111-1136.
Forbes D.P. (2005). Managerial determinants of decision speed in new ventures. Stategic Management Journal, 26(9), 355-366.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Jenatabadi, H. S. (2014). Situation of Innovation in the Linkage between Culture and Performance: A Mediation Analysis of Asian Food Production Industry. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 7(7), 323-331.
Kreiser, P.M., Marino, L.D., & Weaver, K.M. (2002). Assessing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, the external environment, and firm performance scale: A multi-country analysis. In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (199–208). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.
Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of marketing, 75(1), 16-30.
Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2015). What Makes a Family Firm Innovative? CEO Risk‐Taking Propensity and the Organizational Context of Family Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 334- 348.
Lantu, D. C., Triady, M. S., Utami, A. F., & Ghazali, A. (2016). Pengembangan Model Peningkatan Daya Saing UMKM di Indonesia: Validasi Kuantitatif Model. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 15(1), 77-93.
Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Tan, J., & Liu, Y. (2008). Moderating effects of entrepreneurial orientation on market orientation-performance linkage: Evidence from Chinese Small Firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 46(1), 113- 133.
Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 97(1), 135-72.
McGrath, R.G., & MacMillan, I. (2000). The intrepreneurial mindset. Harvard Business School Press: Boston.MA.
Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.
Morris, M.H. & Paul, G.W. (1987). The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(3), 247– 259.
Naman J.L. & Slevin, D.P. (1993). Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: A model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 137–153.
Peterson, R.A., Albaum, G., & Kazmetsky (1986). The public’s definition of small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(3).
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
Rauch A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G.T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (5), 761- 786.
Scott, A. J. (2006). The changing global geography of low-technology, labor- intensive industry: clothing, footwear, and furniture. World Development, 34(9), 1517-1536.
Susanto, Perengki (2010). Pengaruh orientasi pasar pada kinerja perusaha kecil dimediasi oleh orientasi kepengusahaan. Thesis UGM.
Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). The positive effect of a market orientation on business profitability: A balanced replication. Journal of business research, 48(1), 69-73.
Stvenson, H.H., & Jarillo, J.C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal. (Special issue) 11, 17-27.
Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L.D., Zang, Y., & Li, Q. (2008). Exploring an Inverted U-Shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, (1), 219-239.
Thanos, I. C., Dimitratos, P., & Sapouna, P. (2016). The implications of international entrepreneurial orientation, politicization, and hostility upon SME international performance. International Small Business Journal, 1-20
Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 892-902.
Wiklund, J. & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1307-1314.
Zhu, Z., & Matsuno, K. (2016). Entrepreneurial proclivity: its environmental conditions and growth consequences. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 24(1), 20-33.

Downloads

Submitted

2016-12-02

Accepted

2017-04-10

Published

2017-04-29

How to Cite

Wardi, Y., Susanto, P., & Abdullah, N. L. (2017). Orientasi Kewirausahaan pada Kinerja Usaha Kecil dan Menengah (UKM) Sumatera Barat: Analisis Peran Moderasi dari Intensitas Persaingan, Turbulensi Pasar dan Teknologi. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 16(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.12695/jmt.2017.16.1.4

Issue

Section

Articles